|
|
LONG FORM SETTLEMENT NOTICE
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
|
|
BRUCE HEVERLY, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, and the general
public,
|
)
)
|
Case No. 1-05-CV-053711
CLASS ACTION/COMPLEX LITIGATION |
Plaintiff,
|
)
)
)
) |
|
PHIL MARGOLIS, WENDY RADITZ, and NESHAMINY VALLEY NATURAL FOOD DISTRIBUTOR, LTD.,
Individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated,
|
)
)
)
)
)
|
Case No. 1-06-CV-073770 |
Plaintiffs, |
)
)
)
|
|
|
v.
|
)
)
)
|
|
SYMANTEC CORP., and DOES 1-25,
Defendants.
|
)
)
)
|
|
|
|
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
|
TO:
|
ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES RESIDING IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHO, BETWEEN DECEMBER
5, 2001 AND APRIL 11, 2008, PURCHASED ONLINE A SYMANTEC SUBSCRIPTION PRODUCT WITH
A STOCK KEEPING UNIT THAT DESIGNATES THE PRODUCT AS AN UPGRADE, THE INSTALLATION
OF WHICH RESULTED IN THE UNINSTALLATION OF ANOTHER SYMANTEC SUBSCRIPTION PRODUCT
PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF THAT PRODUCT’S SUBSCRIPTION.
|
-
What Is The Purpose Of This Notice? You are receiving this notice
because your rights may be affected by the settlement of a class action lawsuit.
-
What Is This Case About? This lawsuit against Symantec Corp. ("Symantec")
alleges that Symantec, the company that sells Norton computer and Internet security
products, has an unlawful policy of terminating subscription time of certain customers
who purchased upgrades, without providing a credit or refund for unused subscription
time, and that Symantec fails to disclose this policy. The lawsuit asserts that
each class member purchased Norton computer security software which came
with a subscription for regular “content updates” which keep the security software
up to date. These updates are delivered by Symantec via online downloads through
the LiveUpdate feature of the Norton software. As the subscription expiration date
approaches, the Norton security software prompts the user to consider renewing his/her/its
subscription for another term and also presents an opportunity to upgrade to a new
product by making an online purchase. If the user then chooses to purchase an upgrade,
the new subscription begins when the upgrade is installed, not when the existing
subscription expires. Plaintiffs allege that the new subscription should begin when
the existing subscription expires, and that Symantec unlawfully terminated subscription
time without providing a credit or refund and without disclosing this policy.
Symantec denies these allegations and asserts that, at all times, its actions and
business practices have been lawful and appropriate. The Court has not ruled on
the merits of the claims. This means that there has been no ruling as to who wins
and who loses.
To see a list of Norton security software at issue,
click here.
To see a copy of the Consolidated Second Amended Complaint, click here.
-
Who Is Included In The Class Affected By This Settlement? The class
of persons and entities affected by this settlement is the same as the class that
was previously certified in this lawsuit. The Plaintiff Settlement Class is defined
as follows: All persons and entities residing in the United States of America who,
between December 5, 2001 and April 11, 2008, purchased online a Symantec Subscription
Product with a Stock Keeping Unit that designates the product as an upgrade, the
installation of which resulted in the uninstallation of another Symantec Subscription
Product prior to the expiration of that product’s subscription. Symantec Subscription
Product means any antivirus, Internet security, Internet safety and other software
product sold by or on behalf of Symantec with a subscription for protection updates,
content updates and/or other updates, including Norton AntiVirus, Norton Internet
Security, Norton Personal Firewall, Norton SystemWorks, Norton Confidential and
Norton 360. Excluded from the Plaintiff Settlement Class are all persons and entities
who purchased upgrades through Symantec’s Online Store (as distinct from the Symantec
online Renewal Center). Also excluded are defendant, its agents and affiliates,
any government entities, and any persons and entities for whom Symantec added back
the subscription time upon request. Also excluded are those individuals or entities
who previously excluded themselves from the class when notice was previously sent
after the class was certified by the Court on May 7, 2008.
-
What Are The Terms Of The Settlement? The parties have agreed to settle
this case. Because this is a class action, the settlement must be approved by the
Court at the hearing described in Section 5 of this Notice.
The following is a summary of the settlement. To view the complete Settlement Agreement,
click here.
(a) Monetary Benefit. To obtain the individual benefits of this settlement,
you must mail a valid Claim Form to the Settlement Administrator. Symantec will
provide Settlement Class Members who mail a valid Claim Form with one of the following,
to be selected by the Settlement Class Member:
(1) A $15.00 voucher redeemable for the online purchase of any Symantec products
or services available at the Symantec Online Store. The voucher can be combined
with other promotions, offers and discounts and is valid for one year from issuance.
Only one voucher may be used per purchase, and any combination of offers in a transaction
in which a voucher is used can not result in the payment of money to the customer;
or
(2) A cash payment of $2.50.
Click here to go to the Claim Form;
remember to make a selection between the two types of individual relief before submitting
the Claim Form to the Settlement Administrator.
(b) Non-Monetary Benefit. Symantec will include the following disclosure
on the landing page at Symantec’s Renewal Center and on the FAQ page for subscriptions:
|
|
Any subscriptions for upgrade products begin on the day of product installation.
If you replace the Symantec subscription product that you currently have with an
upgrade product, any unused subscription time on the replaced product will not be
added to the upgrade subscription, when the new upgrade product subscription replaces
your current product subscription.
|
This disclosure will remain at these locations for as long as Symantec’s policy
is that unexpired subscription time on a previously owned product is not automatically
added to an upgrade subscription.
(c) Incentive Awards. Symantec will not oppose the payment of an incentive
award of up to $5,000.00 for each of the representative plaintiffs Bruce Heverly,
Phil Margolis and Wendy Raditz.
(d) Other Benefits. Symantec will pay all costs of providing notice
to Settlement Class Members, all costs and expenses of the Settlement Administrator,
and all other costs of Symantec’s implementation and compliance with the terms of
the settlement.
(e) Attorney’s Fees And Costs. Symantec agrees not to oppose an application
by plaintiffs’ class counsel for attorney’s fees and reimbursement of costs and
expenses in an amount not to exceed $2,275,000.00.
(f) Release Of Symantec. Symantec will be released (i.e., discharged)
from all claims of liability of any nature based on claims that were asserted or
that could have been asserted in the lawsuit based upon the facts alleged in the
lawsuit, as more specifically set forth in the Settlement Agreement.
-
When And Where Is The Hearing To Determine Whether To Approve The Settlement?
The Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara will hold a hearing
to determine whether to approve this settlement (the "Fairness Hearing"). The hearing
will be held on August 28, 2009, beginning at 9:00 a.m., in Department 17 at the
Old Courthouse, 191 N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113. The hearing may be adjourned
or continued without further notice.
-
What Are My Options? You have the right, but are not required, to
appear at the Fairness Hearing and be heard on the question of whether this settlement
should be approved. You may retain an attorney to represent you, at your own expense,
if you so choose but you are not required to do so. If you do not retain a separate
attorney, then your interests will be represented by plaintiffs’ class counsel at
the Fairness Hearing.
To receive the monetary benefits of the settlement, you must mail a properly completed
Claim Form to the Settlement Administrator by September 9, 2009. Go to Section 7
of this Notice for more information on submitting a Claim Form. No further action
is required on your part to participate in this settlement.
If you do not wish to remain in the Plaintiff Settlement Class, you must exclude
yourself by mailing an exclusion request by July 27, 2009 to the Settlement Administrator
at: Heverly-Norton Settlement Administrator, c/o Rust Consulting, Inc., P.O. Box
1181, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1181. If you exclude yourself, you may pursue an individual
claim, but you will not receive any of the benefits of the class settlement, and
cannot object to the settlement.
You have the right to object to the settlement and/or to request the opportunity
to intervene in this lawsuit. To do so, your objection and/or request for intervention
must be in writing and must be mailed to the Court at the following address: Clerk
of the Court, Superior Court of the State of California, Santa Clara County, 191
N. First Street, San Jose, CA 95113, and mailed to counsel for the parties by July
27, 2009. Any objections to the settlement must state the name and address of the
Settlement Class Member, must include a statement or documents sufficient to demonstrate
membership in the Plaintiff Settlement Class, and must provide a detailed statement
of each objection asserted, including the grounds for each objection and the reasons,
if any, for requesting the opportunity to appear and be heard at the Fairness Hearing.
Any request for intervention must be accompanied by all arguments and documents
to support that request.
-
How Do I Submit A Claim Form? Claim Forms must be in writing and mailed
to the Settlement Administrator by September 9, 2009. The Claim Form must be mailed
to the following address:
Heverly-Norton Settlement Administrator
c/o Rust Consulting, Inc.
P.O. Box 1181
Minneapolis, MN 55440-1181
The Claim Form must be signed and dated, and you should check off which settlement
benefit you decide to receive. If the Court approves the settlement, the individual
benefits will not be issued until February 9, 2010 at the earliest, and perhaps
later.
Click here to go to/print the Claim
Form.
SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT DATES
Deadline for mailing a Claim Form – September 9, 2009
Fairness Hearing – August 28, 2009, at 9:00 a.m.
Deadline for mailing a request to be excluded from the Plaintiff Settlement Class
– July 27, 2009
Deadline for mailing objections to the settlement and/or requests to intervene –
July 27, 2009
-
Who Are The Attorneys Representing The Parties? The attorneys
representing the class are:
GREEN & PAGANO LLP
Michael Scott Green (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
522 Route 18 North
P.O. Box 428
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
|
KANTROWITZ GOLDHAMER & GRAIFMAN, P.C.
Gary S. Graifman
747 Chestnut Ridge Road
Chestnut Ridge, NY 10977
|
CHAVEZ & GERTLER LLP
Mark A. Chavez (Bar No. 90858)
42 Miller Avenue
Mill Valley, CA 94941
|
SMOLOW & LANDIS
Michael H. Landis (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
204 Two Neshaminy Interplex
Trevose, PA 19053
|
KENDRICK & NUTLEY
C. Benjamin Nutley (Bar No. 177431)
1055 E. Colorado Blvd., 5th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91106
|
|
The attorneys representing Symantec Corporation are:
HOGAN & HARTSON LLP
Robert B. Hawk (Bar No. 118054)
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94301
|
|